A 20mph national speed limit is the single most cost-effective change possible to boost cycling and walking. 20mph limits can treble cycling to school. Localism on setting safer speed limits isn’t enough; the Government must lead with a 20mph default for built up areas.
20’s Plenty for Us agrees that 20mph limits reduce danger and the perception of danger. The City of Edinburgh recorded a trebling of cycling to school and doubling of permission for children to play out.
Our call is for the Government to agree a plan for Total 20 by 2020, which sets a 20mph default for restricted roads but allows local authorities to make exceptions where justified. It’s time that the Government recognised that 20mph is the foundation of active travel. 20mph limits are a popular, cost effective way to raise public health and exercise levels on the 90% of the urban public realm that is streets and pavements.
Most of the largest 40 UK authorities have decided the ‘national speed limit’ of 30mph is not fit for purpose. 15.5m people now live where the default speed limit is 20mph.
Changing the national default to 20mph whilst letting local authorities sign the small number (perhaps up to 10%) of urban roads that might warrant a higher speed limit also makes more sense economically than suggesting that cash-strapped local authorities pay to sign 90% of roads 20mph.
Rod King MBE, Founder of 20’s Plenty for Us commented:- “The Government must wake up, urgently change the National limit to 20mph and let authorities choose roads where other limits are warranted. Otherwise they are simply using “localism” as a fig-leaf for not taking responsibility for the adverse effect of vehicle speed on public health, community life and road danger”.
Comment on the DfT’s consultation by 23 May via https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/draft-cycling-and-walking-investment-strategy – online form or to firstname.lastname@example.org. Ask for default Total 20mph.
Many of the shire counties, which includes Worcestershire, have been behind the urban authorities in implementing 20mph limits. The following summarises a blog on the main 20s Plenty for Us website.
Already the majority of the largest 40 urban authorities have adopted a Total 20 policy. And also 75% of Inner London boroughs.
Some county councils seek to “manage expectations” by adopting policies that are not consistent with DfT guidance in an attempt to dampen down the legitimate aspirations of communities for lower speeds. That isn’t to say all shire counties. Indeed Lancashire has already implemented Total 20 and also Bath & North East Somerset is progressing in its roll-out. Also other places with rural parts or outlying villages are implementing Total 20 in villages. Sefton and Warrington are examples. But it is clear that many shires seem ideologically opposed to 20mph limits in their communities. Continue reading
The national campaign group, 20s Plenty for Us has got a brand new website, where you can find lots more information about the benefits of introducing 20mph speed limits on the roads where people live. See www.20splenty.org.
The Police and Crime Commissioner Bill Longmore says West Mercia Police is now ready to start “applying the same approach” to 20mph limits as legal limits elsewhere, punishing drivers who do not comply.
See the Worcester News article for the full story.
One of the constant hurdles that campaigners for wide area 20mph speed limits have had to face is the lack of support from the local police force. However, with the news that West Mercia Police will now enforce 20mph speed limits, there is a greater chance that we could see more 20mph speed limits in Worcestershire.
The only problem is the current attitude of Worcestershire County Council, especially Councillor John Smith who is the Cabinet Member for Highways. He is not convinced of the benefits of 20mph speed limits. One wonders if any amount of evidence would be sufficient to convince him and some of his cabinet colleagues that there should be more 20mph speed limits on residential roads.
Road injuries hurt an estimated 1% of people a year and its rising. Tackling road risk is key to public health improvement outdoors for all ages. Community-wide 20mph limits confer huge health economic returns in casualties avoided and in active travel exercise gains.
194,477 people were recorded road injured in 2014 (a 6% increase over 2013). Including unreported casualties 700,000 (1%) of Britons are estimated road injured yearly. The vast majority involved motorists hitting people. Adding those too frightened to play out, walk or cycle and underactive makes a staggering illness burden from predictable and preventable road risks. The Department for Transport (2011) estimated that including incidents unreported to the police the value of preventing road crashes was £34.8 billion per year – a whopping £540 per head pa.
With residential 20mph limits Warrington reported a First Year Rate of Return of 800% – the capital costs were recovered in reduced casualty value in just 7 weeks. 20mph limits are a once off cost of approx. £2-3 per head and typically avoid 20% of casualties for years to come.
Wide 20mph limits are best practice according to the World Health Organisation, NICE, Association of Directors of Public Health, Faculty of Public Health, UK Public Health Association, Royal College of Paediatrics & Child Health and National Children’s Bureau. 20mph is an evidence-based, cost effective policy whose lower risk and fitness benefits far exceed its costs. Bristol estimated a £24 per £1 spent benefit to cost ratio on increased walking and over £7 on raised cycling. Implementation is typically £0.5m per 200,000 population and discounted across future years.
For children, the elderly and health equality for age groups, Britain’s top outdoor public health priority is tightly monitored road danger reduction plans with targets and tight recording (like workplace injuries) with careful reflective learning and application of evidence-based danger mitigation measures. Proven prevention policies include 20mph limits for built up areas (each 1mph less reduces crashes and casualties 6%), low alcohol tolerance levels, speed enforcement, hidden cameras, in vehicle speed limiters, presumed liability, no texting whilst driving and a Vision Zero (no deaths) goal. We know the solutions. What we need is the multi-agency working, finance and political will to apply them.
Read more on the 20s Plenty for Us website.
Worcestershire County Council have delayed any decision on making any Worcester streets 20mph until at least 2017.
The Conservative leadership has consistently been against the introduction of 20mph limits and as recently as May voted to reject a Green and Lib Dem motion asking to make it the default speed in built-up areas.
The Conservatives claim to be sceptical about any environmental benefits and the impact on congestion. They have set up a 20mph pilot around some selected streets in Rubery, which is supposedly aimed at exploring if it could be rolled out elsewhere.
The Conservative cabinet says it wants time to assess the outcome of the pilot in detail before looking at any 20mph speed limits in Worcester, thus kicking it into the long grass.
However, the way the County has implemented and will measure the impacts of the Rubery scheme does not adopt best practice from successful schemes implemented in lots of other areas around the UK. Rubery is a minimal engagement pilot and so designed to fail. To conduct a pilot or model you have to understand how the pilot would translate into the real world with an authority-wide implementation. This does not appear to have been done.
Cynically it begs the question as to whether this is deliberate so that they can ‘prove’ 20mph doesn’t work and so be a way to fend off any community pressure for 20mph.
The fact that other places have done 20mph (like 20% of country) means that there already are many existing schemes that council officers could look at and assess, rather than creating their own pilot.
The County Council motion proposed by Councillor Matthew Jenkins was rejected by the ruling Conservatives who all voted against it. There was widespread support from all other groups at the Council.
The motion was as follows:
Many councils across the country, of various party political control, have or are in the process of implementing wide area 20mph speed limits on residential and urban roads without traffic calming. Over 14 million people now live in these areas.
Public health and other bodies such as NICE, Public Health England, the LGA and the WHO all support such a policy. It is described as the most cost-effective way to improve health equality by tackling inactivity, obesity and isolation, whilst also being child, disability, elderly and dementia friendly.
Wide area 20mph limits rarely need any traffic calming measures and in other areas have been shown to be affordable, costing around £3 per person.
Implementing wide area 20mph limits should be a core part of our public health strategy. We therefore ask the County Council to rethink its current policy on 20mph, which restricts where they can be implemented, and call for a Cabinet report into introducing wide area 20mph speed limits on residential and urban roads.
Despite this setback we know that there is strong support for wide area 20mph speed limits both in Worcester and in Worcestershire. We will continue to push for their introduction and work with other local groups to continue the campaign for 20mph speed limits where people live.
Worcester based County Councillor Matthew Jenkins explains why communities are pressuring councils for the implementation of a 20mph speed limit. Read the article here.
Milan is the latest European city to say that 20’s Plenty, or more precisely 30k – Its OK
In the UK we are at the heart of that change with over 20% of the population in places that have or are implementing a 20mph limit for most roads.
The 6th Annual 20mph Places conference is in the Guildhall, Cambridge on 12th March and at a cost from just £125* this could be the best investment made all year.
- It brings together presenters showing best practice implementations of city-wide 20mph limits in some of our major iconic conurbations.
- It develops the public health and public sector equality benefits
- It shows how it is a foundation for a cycling revolution and an urban renaissance.
Learn how 20mph limits go far beyond road safety and tick the many boxes for liveability, active travel, modal shift, noise reduction, casualty reduction and a real saving in future public health costs. Learn how funding can come from many sources rather than transport or road safety. Understand how your PSED relates to setting speed limitsFor Councillors
For officers and consultants in transport and public health
Gain from the real experience of implementations in Cambridge where zones with physically calmed entrances are leading the way in hybrid zonal 20mph limits. Find out about the large roll-out in Manchester and it promotion of community ownership. Learn how Liverpool with their 20Effect programme are leveraging city-pride and identity to make their roll-out successful. See how Calderdale are bringing public health and transport teams together to maximise behaviour change.
Hear the keynote presentations and discussions from the leaders in cycle advocacy and pedestrian representation. Chris Boardman MBE and Joe Irvin.
You can download a conference leaflet from http://www.20splentyforus.org.uk/20mph_it’s_miles_better.htm and make a direct booking at www.transportXtra.com/events.
* £125+vat rate for public sector booked before 17th Feb. See above links for full delegate rate range.
Campaigners please contact email@example.com and there is a free campaigner evening event.
We really look forward to you booking and attending the conference. If you need any further details then please just contact 20s Plenty for Us – details at http://www.20splentyforus.org.uk/contact_us.htm
PLEAS are being made to turn a Worcester estate into a 20 miles-per-hour zone – with more than 160 people signing a petition calling for a slow down.
Residents on the Blanquettes estate, near Bilford Road in Perdiswell, say lives are being put at risk by drivers.
Read more on the Worcester News website.